Issue #46 ~ Someone witty once said: “It’s hard finding a black cat in a dark room” and then added sarcastically:” …especially when there is no black cat”. This metaphor of a *non-existent black cat in a dark room* is frequently used by atheists to argue against religion (God being the cat), but here I want to argue against the view that space and time need to be quantized.
Thank you for this. I would be interested in your perspective on Loop Quatum Gravity pperspective on this, ie theat time is not fundemental but emerges as aymmtric energy or informational flow. as I understand it. The question is can we imagine a situation extreme enough where it might be meaningful to describe space and time as being discrete or quatised.
That’s brilliant, Vlatko. But what bothers me is discussing the existence of space-time with movement, that is to say already… time. The problem of the real existence or not of movement is still not resolved. There are big fundamental problems to be resolved. Go read a solution:
I think the direction you're going here is quite good. Thanks. And I suspect, from the title of your book, you take it further.
However, you would want to consider the more integrated approach to space and in the ancient holistic Vedic 3-in-1 account of phenomenal 'levels of spacetime' (associated with perspectives in different states of consciousness). I have papers that address these issues, if you are open to them.
On ResearchGate.net (full-text/open-access), e.g., are 'What's the Full Range of Nature?", or "The Scientific Method as Practiced: Its Successes, Limitations, and How to Progress Deeper", or "Unsolved Problems' in Physics Today and How Holistic Models Help Solve Them", or "Evidence of Vedic Renaissance: From Veda to Modern Science and Back" -- and also the book published by Routledge that has more detail: "Pointless: The Reality behind Quantum Theory." It'd be useful and fun to discuss the issues further with you. Best wishes,
Thank you for this. I would be interested in your perspective on Loop Quatum Gravity pperspective on this, ie theat time is not fundemental but emerges as aymmtric energy or informational flow. as I understand it. The question is can we imagine a situation extreme enough where it might be meaningful to describe space and time as being discrete or quatised.
Thanks Vlatko! Your thoughts are always fun to read! I do my best to understand it! For sure, we do live in a wonderful and very mysterious Universe
That’s brilliant, Vlatko. But what bothers me is discussing the existence of space-time with movement, that is to say already… time. The problem of the real existence or not of movement is still not resolved. There are big fundamental problems to be resolved. Go read a solution:
https://surimposium.rhumatopratique.com/en/movement-an-illusion/
I think the direction you're going here is quite good. Thanks. And I suspect, from the title of your book, you take it further.
However, you would want to consider the more integrated approach to space and in the ancient holistic Vedic 3-in-1 account of phenomenal 'levels of spacetime' (associated with perspectives in different states of consciousness). I have papers that address these issues, if you are open to them.
On ResearchGate.net (full-text/open-access), e.g., are 'What's the Full Range of Nature?", or "The Scientific Method as Practiced: Its Successes, Limitations, and How to Progress Deeper", or "Unsolved Problems' in Physics Today and How Holistic Models Help Solve Them", or "Evidence of Vedic Renaissance: From Veda to Modern Science and Back" -- and also the book published by Routledge that has more detail: "Pointless: The Reality behind Quantum Theory." It'd be useful and fun to discuss the issues further with you. Best wishes,
Bob (RW Boyer)